Common Bent-wing Bat

BIRD: linking the biodiversity community
Common bentwing bat head 341 Lindy Lumsden.jpg
Common Bent-wing Bat map group341.jpg

Distribution of Common Bent-wing Bat Miniopterus schreibersii all sub-species. Source VBA Dec. 2013

Common Bent-wing Bat map eastern ssp341.jpg

Distribution of Common Bent-wing Bat Miniopterus schreibersii oceanensis (eastern subspecies). Source VBA Dec. 2013

Common bentwing bat map 341 south west.JPG

Most records of the critically endangered Southern Bent-wing Bat Miniopterus schreibersii bassanii occur in south-west Victoria, with clusters of records in the Otways, near Warrnambool and in the Portland area at Lower Glenelg National Park and Crawford River State Park. Source VFD 2009.

Common bent-wing bat hanging 341 Lindy Lumsden.jpg
Southern Bent-wing Bat
Miniopterus schreibersii bassanii
Australia: critically endangered (EPBC Act)
Victoria: endangered
FFG: listed

The Common Bent-wing Bat Miniopterus schreibersii, also known as the Large Bent-wing Bat in eastern and central Victoria or Southern Bent-wing Bat in southern Victoria has dark brown to redish brown fur above, grey-brown fur underneath and pale brown areas of bare skin. Head and body length 52mm-58mm, forearm 45-49mm. It has a short muzzle, high crowned head, broad rounded ears and small eyes. It has the longest wing length of all the Vespertilionidae, being nearly two and half times longer than the head and body. A diagnostic feature of the wing structure is the terminal phalanx (segment) of the longest finger, which is more than three times as long as the previous phalanx (Dwyer 1983, Hall & Woodside 1989, Menkhorst. & Lumsden 1995).

Identification is best carried out by non-handling techniques and certainly not by entering known roost sites. A preferred method of identification is by recording and analysing call sequences as each bat species has its own frequency range.

Unlike most other species of insectivorous bats the Common Bent-wing Bat roosts exclusively in caves or cave like structures rather than trees. Despite its name the southern sub-species is in fact not common, it is reliant on only one or two caves for rearing young and a handful of caves for roosting, some of which are visited by humans which reduce their suitability as roosting habitat.

Three subspecies of the Common Bent-wing Bat are recognised in Australia;

  • Miniopterus schreibersii orianae (northern subspecies) found in the northern part of Western Australia and Northern Territory.
  • Miniopterus schreibersii oceanensis (eastern subspecies ) also known as the Large Bent-wing Bat, considered vulnerable, occurring near coastal eastern Australia from the northern tip of Queensland down the east coast including New South Wales and extending to central Victoria.
  • Miniopterus schreibersii bassanii (southern subspecies ) also known as the Southern Bent-wing Bat considered critically endangered and distributed in south-western Victoria extending into the south-east corner of South Australia.

Habitat & Ecology

Habitat preference is associated with the availability of foraging areas and proximity to suitable roosting caves, many of which are located near coastal cliffs. Foraging areas include forested areas, Volcanic Plains, wetlands and coastal vegetation including beaches. Distances travelled from roosting caves is often less than several kilometres for small microchiropterans and is dependent upon reproductive condition, for instance lactating females travel shorter distances than pregnant females or non-breeding females. Where roost sites are located in sub-optimal foraging habitat the distances travelled may increase perhaps up to 30km. Pregnant females undertake much longer journeys when they fly to maternity caves for giving birth (Kunz & Lumsden 2003).

Different caves are used depending on the season, reproductive stage and sex of the bat. For instance adult males, pregnant females and juveniles tend to group at separate caves during particular times of the year. Females have specific requirements for giving birth and rearing young, which includes a dome type cave, which retains warmth and humidity for development of the young. These caves are referred to as maternity caves.

The Common Bent-wing Bat can live up to 20 years. Breeding takes place in late May and early June, however the onset of gestation is delayed through winter until August. By late November to December females congregate at maternity caves where a single young is born to each female. A strong bond is developed between mother and young, which persists beyond the first flight to when the young leave the cave en mass (Hall & Woodside 1989). By February to March the young are free flying and tend to roost in their own caves, the adult females return to the same roosting caves each year after giving birth at the maternity cave whilst adult males tend to stay resident in the adult roosting cave throughout the year.

There are only two recognised maternity caves for the Common Bent-wing Bat in Victoria, one in East Gippsland (Miniopterus schreibersii oceanensis - eastern subspecies) and one in south-west Victoria, near Warnambool (Miniopterus schreibersii bassanii- southern subspecies ). The population using the Warrnambool cave is thought to be genetically different to the East Gippsland population and more related to the population that utilises a maternity cave at Naracoorte in South Australia.

The Common Bent-wing Bat is nocturnal and uses echolocation (emission of ultrasonic sounds) for navigation and feeding. Recording and analysing call sequences provides a means of identifying a particular species of bat as each species has its own frequency range. Feeding is carried out during flight and prey is caught in the tail or wing membrane and transferred to the mouth whilst in flight, sometimes insects are caught in the mouth (Hall & Woodside 1989). Diet consists of a range of night flying insects eg. Order Diptera (mosquitos, midges), Lepidoptera (moths), Orthoptera (crickets), Coleoptera (beetles), Hemiptera (bugs), Hymenoptera (ants). Vespertilionids play a major role as the nocturnal predator of night flying insects, many of which are a nuisance to humans. It is estimated the Common Bent-wing Bat can consume about 25% of its 15 gram body weight per meal and may eat two or three meals per night, therefore a population of 1000 bats could consume several kilograms of insects per night.

On return to their roosting caves they cluster at preferred microclimates within the cave. During this time they carry out grooming and rest by lowering their body temperature to the ambient temperature and go into a torpor state for a period of hours. Over the winter months when insect activity is low and food is not readily available they go into a deep hibernation and select the coolest caves and coolest part of the cave. During this time their body temperature can be down to 20C, which limits the loss of body fats through winter (Speakman & Thomas 2003). They are particularly prone to disturbance when at rest as valuable reserves of body fat are consumed if disturbed.

Common Bent-wing Bat body 500 Lindy Lumsden.jpg

Images of Common Bent-wing Bat (right) from Lindy Lumsden


There has been a severe decline in the Southern Bent-wing Bat. The total population size was estimated to be approximately 200,000 several decades ago, now it is down to about 40,000. The winter count in 2010 only found about 25,000 although this low number may be attributed to the fact that further winter roosting sites are yet to be located.

Human disturbance

Probably the most severe impact on a population is caused through human disturbance at roost sites because it can result in abandonment of a cave. During a state of torpor and particularly over winter when the bats are in a deep hibernation human disturbance in the form of noise, lights and handling can cause a rise in body temperature, which uses up body reserves. If there is repeated exposure this can result in loss of body reserves beyond recovery and the bat is likely to die.

Disturbance at a maternity cave is considered a major threat because it can impact on the breeding success of the population.

Disturbance during summer has been identified as a problem in some areas where tourists and holidaymakers enter caves, which is likely to result in bats fleeing the cave in daylight and using valuable energy reserves and making them more prone to predators. Repeated disturbance can result in abandonment of the cave. Disturbance has bee identified as an issue in some areas along the coastline where otherwise perfectly good caves have been rendered unsuitable, sometimes forcing bats to use much smaller caves and crevices that are marginal habitat, which can only support low numbers (Lumsden 1998).

The use of different caves is an integral part of the ecology of this species, therefore it should not be assumed that disturbance which leads to abandonment of a cave will result in the bats simply moving to another cave. It will most likely cause mortalities and have wider implications for the populations roosting, social organisation and mating behaviour.


The impact of insecticides on insect numbers and therefore food for the Bent-wing bat is unknown, however ingestion of insects treated with insecticides may cause secondary poisoning. Direct ingestion of insecticides can occur particularly when grooming fur or wings that have been exposed to spray.

Impacts on foraging habitats

Habitat change mainly through loss of trees and loss of connectivity between landscape elements may reduce range, as generally bats are reluctant to cross open landscapes (Racey & Entwistle 2003). Loss of wetlands through drainage can impact on feeding areas.

Windfarm developments

The positioning of wind turbines near known or potential feeding areas and in bat flight lines has been raised an issue and is relevant to several proposed windfarms in the South West region of Victoria. Wind turbines located near roosting caves (particularly near a maternity cave) raises the likelihood of contact between rotating blades and bats, particularly as there is a concentration of bats from around the region and there is frequent flying to and from the maternity cave when raising young. A full assessment of potential impacts on bats should be part of any development proposal, which includes assessment of flight paths between the maternity cave and roost sites, between maternity cave and feeding sites and between roost sites and feeding areas.

Introduced predators

In Victoria, predators include the introduced Black Rat, Feral Cat, and Red Fox.

Common bentwing bat in cave2 341.JPG

Bats clustered together on the roof of a roosting cave. Image: Gabrielle Lanman

Cave Management

There is a need to protect the microclimate inside maternity caves which under natural conditions maintains a constant temperature and level of humidity. Caves which are modified by enlarging or closing off vents can alter the microclimate. In some cases caves need to be protected from erosion and inappropriate use of heavy machinery which may cause a cave to collapse.


Protection of caves, both the maternity cave near Warrnambool and the various roosting caves which need to be free of human disturbance. Gates, barriers or fencing out areas from human disturbance is required at many sites. Gates or bars must allow movement of bats and it has been found that in order to design a grill to prevent humans it will also be detrimental to the movement of bats. The provision of a free space above any grill at least 66cm high is required for the movement of bats in and out of a cave (Lumsden 1998). Before any gate or barrier is installed it is recommended that advice from bat ecologist be obtained.

Management of disused mines may provide suitable habitat for bats and can play a role in expanding or substituting roosting habitat. In Australia there are approximately 31 species of bat which use caves and derelict mines, including the Common Bent-wing Bat. Assessment of disused mines for bat presence and gauging levels of human interference are necessary steps in determining what measures are required for protection. A comprehensive publication by the Australian Centre for Mining Environmental Research provides guidelines on how to identify and protect bat conservation values in disused mines (Thompson 2002).

Common bentwing bat flying341 Steve Bourne1.JPG

Image: Steve Bourne

Specific Actions for the conservation of the Common Bent-wing Bat

Improve understanding of the distribution of the Common Bent-wing Bat by onducting surveys in caves and disused mines across Victoria as part of a state wide survey effort.

Ensure important roost sites are regularly monitored for evidence of predation by introduced predators and control measures implemented.

Monitor important roost sites for human disturbance an implement control measures, including physical barriers, education and signage where undue disturbance is occurring.

DEPI can assist Local Government Planning by ensuring important roost sites are included into planning overlays so sites are recognised when developments are proposed.

Monitor habitat at roosting caves/mines to ensure they remain accessible to bats and are not overgrown by weeds or blocked off by collapse of mine entrance.

Discourage dumping of rubbish in caves.

For the North East Forest Management Plan and the East Gippsland Forest Management Plan implement a Special Protection Zone buffer of 100 m around all breeding and roosting caves and mines and known over-wintering sites.

Contribute to a state-wide register of roosting sites (caves, mines, rock crevices, tunnels, culverts etc). This register would contain a range of information relating to the site including the need for intensive management such as weed removal or vegetation management.

Monitoring known over-wintering sites to determine usage, numbers and potential threats to sites.

Statewide Research

  • Undertake further genetic work to determine if M. s. bassanii is distinct enough to warrant full species recognition.
  • Undertake research to design a gate that is suitable to install at disused mines to prevent human access (and hence reduce public risk) that will be accepted by this species.
  • Collect further genetic samples from a number of locations across central Victoria and analyse genetically to refine the distribution of the two subspecies and determine the extent of their distributions.
  • Prepare an Action Statement under the Flora & Fauna Guarantee and National Recovery Plan under the EPBC Act (in progress).

Specific actions for the critically rndangered Southern Bent-wing Bat maternity cave near Warrnambool

  • Continue population monitoring during summer period. (Chris Grant of Deakin University previously undertook research at this site ),
  • Incorporate site into City of Warrnambool planning scheme to ensure that no inappropriate developments (e.g. wind farms) are located in close proximity to this cave.
  • Liaise with landholder regarding management of the site through an agreed management plan.

Actions being undertaken at Warrnambool maternity cave in 2010

  • Fence Surface area of the cave to exclude heavy machinery
  • Stock proof Fence around solution pipe entrances
  • Monitor the cliff area for collapse
  • Conduct a more detailed exploration for further cavities along the coast
  • Ensure the landowner is aware that the cave roof will not support heavy machinery indefinitely.

Winter monitoring in 2010

  • Results are now compiled into a Central Data Storage system.
  • It is found that during winter the bats migrate to a large number of caves.
  • In May 2010 there were 23 volunteers who visited 31 caves from the Otways to the South Australian border.
  • Consistent Data Collection Methods are now being used.
  • Approximately 23,500 Southern Bent-wing Bats were observed in Victoria and South Australia. This is considerably less than the estimated 40,000 known from summer counts, suggesting further roosting sites are yet to be located.

Actions for 2010 - 2011

  • Summer monitoring 1 - Identify how many young are born
  • Summer Monitoring 2 -Identify where population decline is occurring
  • Use the Geotechnical Report to underpin a Management Plan
  • Map over wintering sites
  • Map wetlands within a 30km radius of key roost sites
  • Include roost sites in planning overlays held by local council
  • Investigate options for maintenance of microclimatic conditions of the Starlight maternity cave
  • Winter Survey Round 2

Actions for 2011 - 2012

These actions primarily relate to the critically endangered Southern Bent-wing Bat.

  • Two surveys were completed at Starlight Cave during the 2011-2012 summer, these surveys focused on gaining estimates of the female population and also to determine the survival rate of pups to juveniles.
  • A thermal imaging camera was used for summer monitoring counts at Starlight Cave by detecting the numbers of bats exiting the cave each night in December. It is estimated that 10-15,000 adult Southern Bent-wing Bats used the cave last summer. An automated counting system has been used at the Naracoorte Bat Cave. See Southern Bent-wing Bat research at Naracoorte Caves
  • Autumn migration monitoring was undertaken at Starlight Cave using Anabat recordings to determine the timing of the migration to roosting caves.
  • A 3D image of the Starlight Cave roof is being created to determine the approximate surface area of the roof. This information is necessary to determine estimates of adult bats and pups by counting bats over a small known area and extrapolating out to the surface area.
  • Monitoring of overwintering caves was carried out in Victoria and South Australia in July 2012 but more information is required on the location of winter roosting areas. Further searches for caves that support Southern Bent-wing Bats is needed. It is important to note the survey teams use passive recording techniques so as to minimise disturbance to overwintering bats.
  • A draft management plan for Starlight Cave is expected to be completed in 2012. The plan will identify and provide possible solutions to overcome risks to the bat population at the cave. The plan is an important step in securing the long-term protection for the only known maternity cave in Victoria and one of only two maternity caves for this species..

Actions for 2013

These actions primarily relate to the critically endangered Southern Bent-wing Bat.

A Management Plan for the Starlight Cave maternity cave near Warrnambool was completed in 2013 with approved actions implemented to protect the only known Victorian breeding cave and maternity population.

Results from the July 2012 surveys have been collated. A total of 33 known Victorian habitat caves were surveyed over two days in July 2012. Counts were made by analysing images and counting the number of bats per square metre. A further nine new caves were checked for evidence of use by roosting bats. Approximately 4200 bats were counted. The South Australian count only managed to locate approximately a third (15,478) of their estimated population during winter.

The 2012/13 summer monitoring program consisted of two maternity cave monitoring events aimed at determining the female Southern Bent-wing bat population estimates as well as the rate of juvenile survival and species recruitment. A thermal imaging camera was used to film the evening exit of bats. Results for this work are being analysed.

Bat call recorders have been installed in Starlight Cave and a significant non-breeding roost cave since March 2013 to better determine bat movements and cave usage. A further five non-breeding caves are being monitored monthly with count estimates and limited bat call recordings (since March / April).

Partner groups include:

  • Victorian Speleological Association
  • Parks Victoria staff
  • Species experts
  • Department of Environment and Primary Industries staff
  • Landholders with bat caves who assisted with access

Plans for 2014

  • Two summer counts are planned for the Starlight maternity cave in December 2013 and January 2014.
  • Undertake a further survey to discover where the majority of the Southern bent-wing Bat population roosts over the winter months.
  • Undertake research to determine if wind farms pose a potential threat to the Southern Bent-wing Bat.

Selected references and further information:

  • Dwyer, P. D. (1983) Common Bent-wing Bat Miniopterus schreibersii, Complete book of Australian Mammals, Ed. Strahan, R., Angus & Robertson Publishers.
  • Hall, l. S. & Woodside, D. P. (1989) Vespertilionidae. Pp. 871-886 in Walton, D.W. & Richardson, B.J. (eds) Fauna of Australia. Mammalia. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service Vol. 1B
  • Kunz,T.H. & Lumsden, L.F. (2003) Ecology of Cavity and Folage Roosting Bats, In; Bat Ecology, pp 3-89, (Eds). Kunz, T.H. & Fenton, M.B., The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London
  • Lumsden, L. (1998) Inspection of the Cumberland River Cave and its Colony of Common Bent-wing Bats, Miniopterus schreibersii, with Management Recommendations, A Report to Parks Victoria, Angahook – Lorne State Park, July 1998.
  • Menkhorst, P.W. & Lumsden, L.F. (1995) Common Bent-wing Bat, In; Mammals of Victoria, (Ed). Menkhorst, P.W., Oxford University Press, South Melbourne, Australia.
  • Menkhorst, P. (2001) A field guide to the mammals of Australia, Common Bentwing Bat, Oxford University Press, South Melbourne, Australia.
  • Racey, P.A. & Entwistle, A. C. (2003) Conservation Ecology, In; Bat Ecology, pp 680-743, (Eds). Kunz, T.H. & Fenton, M.B., The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
  • Speakman,J.R. & Thomas, D.W. (2003) Physiological Ecology and Energetics of Bats, In; Bat Ecology, pp 430-489, (Eds). Kunz, T.H. & Fenton, M.B., The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
  • Thompson, B. (2002) Australian Handbook for the Conservation of Bats in Mines and Artifical Cave-Bat Habitats, Australian Centre for Mining Environmental Research, Kenmore, Queensland.

Cave dwelling bats in Victoria

  • Southern Bent-wing Bat Miniopterus schreibersii bassanii
  • Large Bent-wing Bat Miniopterus schreibersii oceanensis (central and eastern Victoria)
  • Eastern Horseshoe Bat Rhinolophus megaphylus (eastern Victoria)
  • Lesser Long-eared Bat Nyctophilus geoffroyi
  • Large Footed Myotis Myotis adversus

See also:

This BIRD page is brought to you by the State Wide Integrated Flora & Fauna Team.

Feel free to edit, but please take care to preserve the integrity of the data. For example, listed management actions are derived from FFG Action Statements and the Actions for Biodiversity Conservation database administered by DEPI and should not normally be changed without prior discussion.

SWIFFT does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of information on this page and any person using or relying upon such information does so on the basis that the SWIFFT shall bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any errors, faults, defects or omissions in the information.